Showing posts with label McCormick and Schmick's. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McCormick and Schmick's. Show all posts

Thursday, May 5, 2011

What else is on Landry's plate

The leadership team at Landry’s Restaurants must be a tuckered bunch. They’re in the midst of a remarkably shrewd attempt to take control of McCormick & Schmick’s, a competitor of the company’s namesake brand. But that’s just one of the matters that likely has them gulping coffee and dreaming of vacation.

There’s also a lawsuit arising from an earlier acquisition, revealed as part of the thrust and parry with McCormick & Schmick’s management. The executives filed a PowerPoint presentation yesterday with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that spells out why they’d rejected Landry’s $9.25-a-share purchase offer. The presentation is apparently being given to shareholders, and hence had to be put on record with federal regulators.

Among the stated reasons for opposing the takeover are the alleged “dubious dealings” of Landry’s and its principal owner, Tilman Fertitta. The pertinent slide asserts that Fertitta has used “coercive tactics” in past takeover attempt. It cites the example of Fertitta’s release of an offer to buy Smith & Wollensky without the steakhouse chain’s permission.

McCormick & Schmick’s apparently thinks it’s coercive to let shareholders know what a prospective buyer is willing to pay, instead of letting the seller’s management filter that information to the owners.

The dubious-dealings slide also cites a lawsuit filed on April 27 by the former owners of Bubba Gump Shrimp Co., the Forrest Gump-themed dinnerhouse chain that Landry’s acquired last year. According to McCormick & Schmick’s, the suit accuses Landry’s of breaching its fiduciary responsibilities to the sellers.

No details were provided, and a number of internet searches turned up nary a word. Landry’s, as a private company, typically doesn’t discuss such matters.

If that’s all the team at Landry’s had on their plate, they’d be excused for looking a little haggard. But they also have to prepare for the likelihood of getting a green light on another acquisition, the purchase of an Atlantic City casino from Donald Trump.
Landry’s offer of $38 million has already been accepted. But the sale and changeover of the property to a Golden Nugget casino-hotel has yet to be approved by state gaming regulators.

Meanwhile, there’s still the issue of bagging McCormick & Schmick’s. As the company had said in an earlier SEC filing, it thinks Landry’s is trying to lowball the market with its $9.25 bid. So, it announced, management was commencing a formal sale. Suitors welcomed.

Fertitta responded by praising the company for realizing it should change hands. He then dropped his hostile takeover attempt and announced he’d pursue the company in the very fashion it preferred. He’d get in touch with the appropriate sales agents and begin the negotiations.

You have to wonder how he’ll respond if they show him the PowerPoint presentation.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Raiding retailers for restaurants' new stars

If recent executive changes are a telltale sign, the restaurant industry is losing faith in its ability to revive sales. Companies determined to crack the formula have looked past the trade’s own talent bench in recent weeks to fill vacancies with code breakers from the world of retailing.

The new CEO of Outback and Carrabba’s parent company was previously focused on selling perfumes, cosmetics and holiday ornaments. Liz Smith, formerly president of Avon Products, seems an unlikely candidate to head OSI Restaurant Partners, a company long led by men who’d worked their way up from restaurant-level jobs. But OSI noted that Smith had experience in running a highly efficient company. They didn’t have to explain that Avon, almost purely a sales company, is light on payroll and structure, heavy on incentive-based performance.

Officials also mentioned that Smith had to keep Avon in touch with customer preferences if its product line was to stay relevant, a skill some say has languished inside OSI’s headquarters in recent years.

A talent for embellishing a brand was similarly one of the characteristics cited by Dunkin’ Brands in explaining why it’d reached outside the industry for its new “chief global customer and marketing officer.” John Costello, a veteran of Home Depot and Sears, “is one of the most talented marketers and brand builders in the retail industry in America," crowed Nigel Travis, CEO of the Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins parent. Indeed, Costello is a member of the Retail Advertising Hall of Fame.

The selection underscores that Dunkin’ is less a restaurant than a to-go bakery with extensive food and beverage options. It’s more of a retail storefront than a place where you’d go for dinner, or at least at present.

Even less of a disconnect is the promotion of supermarket vet Susan Shields to chief marketing officer of Jamba Juice, the smoothie chain. A key component of Jamba’s comeback plan is putting its name on more retail products through licensing deals. Those Jamba-branded items already range from a toy blender to a new line of trail mix that’s about to hit stores. Who better to blaze that new revenue channel than someone who worked at the Safeway grocer chain?

At the same time, dollars are dollars and finance is finance. So why not go outside the industry for your next chief financial officer, as McCormick & Schmick’s did in hiring Michelle Lantow? But it’s no coincidence, the upscale seafood chain said, that she came from a retail apparel manufacturer, Lucy Activewear.

Lantow was instrumental in revamping Lucy’s e-commerce operations and plotting its move into brick-and-mortar retail locations, the company noted in announcing her appointment. CEO Bill Freeman observed that those qualifications should serve M&S well as “we continue to focus on greater connectivity with our guests.”

One of those efforts, apparently, was the chain’s development of a group-sales program aimed at companies that are embarking on a road show to hawk their goods and services. M&S is pitching its banquet service as a one-stop shop that spares those road warriors the hassle of having to scout out a function room and banquet facilities at each stop of their dog-and-pony tours.

There’s no word yet if a retailing veteran was tapped to head it up. But if you hear someone greeting the guests with a “Welcome to McCormick & Schmick’s,” shoot me an e-mail, okay?

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Don't bogart that financial statement

This week's earnings reports are giving the restaurant industry a new riff for its all-night blues jam. And, man, it's a killer. If the business could find enough green shoots, its best shot at solace might be to smoke 'em.

Consider, for instance, the meltdown at the high end of the casual market. The comp sales figure provide the slide work on this one: Morton's, down 26.1%; Ruth's Chris, down 23%; McCormick & Schmick's, down 17.3%; Benihana, down 13.1%. Keep in mind that several of those big-ticket players have already armed themselves with steep discounts relative to their usual prices. There's just not enough expense-account and top-ticket tourism business to avert a sales plummet. Ruth's Chris, for instance, said a continuation of its comps trend would cost each store about $1 million a year in sales.

But that's casual dining, and the top drawer at that. Surely it's a different story for fast-food.

Sure enough, comps ebbed only a little more than a percentage point for company-run Jack in the Box restaurants, and the damage wasn't much worse for the burger concept's little sister of a brand, Qdoba.

But in analyzing the factors for the benefit of investors, Jack in the Box CEO Linda Lang acknowledged that breakfast, one of the areas of growth for the whole sector, had been weak.

"We also saw some fall-off in sales [of] side items, carbonated beverages, and shakes," added Lang. Throw coffee in there, and you have the key profit drivers of fast-food.

Jack's solution: Discount deeper. The chain recently added a head-turner called the Big Deal, a cheeseburger, taco, fries and a drink, for $2.99. And, says Lang, "We currently have additional value-priced product or promotions in test elsewhere in our system." She described them as "margin neutral or margin friendly," without revealing specifics.

BurgerBusiness, Scott Hume's site devoted to all things burgers, noted in a recent posting that $2.99 is the new $5, the rockbottom threshold where everyone wanted to be earlier this year. As he pointed out, White Castle and Sonic are already offering meals at that price level.

Even Hardee's, a proponent of heft, is dabbling with bargain-priced snacks, vis-a-vis its new biscuit holes.

Product giveaways have become a routine way for chains to flycast for more customers. But if an everyday meal costs a mere $2.99, will that hook stay as irresistible? Or might "cheap" become irreversibly associated in the public's mind with "quick-service"?

I don't know, but I bet we're going to find out.