For once, Mayor Bloomberg isn’t the villain behind a regulatory burden that’s about to drop on New York restaurant. But he’s not strong enough politically to be the hero, either. Despite the Mayor’s resistance, restaurants and other businesses in the city will likely be hit with a requirement to provide paid sick leave for employees.
The mandate wouldn’t go into effect until April 2014, and initially some small places would get a reprieve. A business would not be required to provide the five days of paid sick leave until it employed at least 20 people. Eighteen months later, the threshold would drop to 15 staffers.
Restaurants of course fall squarely within that target group. Those small enough to be exempt will be obliged to allow employees to take five days of unpaid sick leave without risk of losing their jobs.
Mayor Bloomberg is expected to veto the paid sick leave bill, which was pushed through the City Council by a consortium of labor groups. But the Council has enough votes to override his rejection.
The key figure in the wranglings: Speaker Christine Quinn, who is expected to succeed Bloomberg as mayor. She had been a staunch opponent of paid sick leave, but caved under pressure by big get-out-the-vote groups.
However, her attempts to temper the bill were lauded by the New York City Hospitality Alliance, a year-old trade group that represents restaurants and hotels in the New York area.
"We believe that this new 100% employer funded mandate properly belongs in discussion in the New York State Legislature where the cost can be funded by employers and employees, and administered by the State," executive director Andrew Rigie said in a prepared statement. "However, we recognize the political realities in New York City do not presently allow for this...We thank Speaker Quinn for standing up for the small business community in these difficult economic times."
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Sunday, March 17, 2013
What I'm hearing
Here’s a download of the more intriguing speculations that
reached my ears as I made the airline and hotel industries a little richer
these past few weeks.
Cheese is the new
bacon. It’s far from the only ingredient to be hailed as the next palate obsession.
Restaurant sages have predicted a passing of the mantle to all sorts of flavorful
treats, from higher-end chocolate to srirachi to other parts of a pig (ears and
cracklings, among others.) But you can’t help noticing how much is happening
right now with cheese, the tangy foundation for a number of oddball restaurant
concepts (mac and cheese joints, grilled-cheese sandwich shoppes, and, if you
stretch the notion a bit, a slew of better pizzerias and pies.) Clearly it’s a
major component of the artisanal and local shifts. Good work, cows, goats and
sheep.
Menus may be the next
area of personalization. Any number of online shopping services now automatically
present a list of choices that fit your consumption patterns. Why couldn’t the
same be done with the new generation of restaurant menus? Technomic’s Darren
Tristano predicts a day when menu boards will scramble and reform for each
customer so patrons won’t have to scour the whole listing for what they like to
eat.
Forgoing parking lots
could gain traction as a green gesture. If you build one, they’ll
definitely come, most likely in their carbon-spewing cars. So what happens if
you don’t? Will that encourage the use of bikes, sidewalks, public
transportation, or, at the very worst, municipal lots that spare more planted
downtown spaces from being turned into macadam and concrete lots? LYFE Kitchen,
a concept that could become the next Chipotle, is already pursuing a no-lot
policy.
Ice, ice baby.
Design kitchens, once arguably the old bacon, are being rivaled as a must-have
cool feature by the ice bar, a drink counter or common table made of frozen
water. Once, they were the sort of
decadent design element you saw in Las Vegas, along with waitresses in skimpy
outfits and feathered headdresses. Now you can spot them at airports and
business hotels. Can ice castles on Main Street be far behind?
Monday, March 11, 2013
We lean toward leaning forward. Amen to that.
A new phrase has entered the vernacular, courtesy of the
fast-selling new book from Google COO Sheryl Sandburg: Lean forward. You may
not have heard it uttered in the restaurant business, but that’s only because
our paradigms of female success have been too busy advancing to master the
lingo.
Sandburg’s thesis is a contradiction of the idea that women
lean back from ambition. We need to sit her down with a margarita and a burger
and do some serious talking, because female ambition and success are hardly a novelty
in our business. Our women have been leaning forward since the days of Allie
Marriott, Joan Kroc, June Martino, Esther Snyder, Sue Aramian, Ella Brennan and
Maude Chasen.
Forget for a minute the women who’ve risen to top jobs by
proving that smarts trump testosterone anytime. Liz Smith heads Bloomin’
Brands, a.k.a. Outback Steakhouse, an operation that all but required its
executives to wear a jock and cup. She’s a former president of Avon, but you’re
a fool if you doubt she can play as hard-knuckles as need be in headquarters,
the boardroom, and meetings with investors.
Sandra Cochran is the CEO of Cracker Barrel, a company
founded by a brilliant but old-school force who referred to powerful women like
Hillary Clinton as femin-Nazis. I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest it
wasn’t easy for a woman to rise in that culture. Anyone think she’s not been
masterful in handling a takeover challenge from Sardar Biglari?
If there’s a better quick-service turnaround artist than
Cheryl Bachelder, the Harry Potter who’s resurrected Popeyes despite the Vegas
odds, please point her out. But don’t waste your time by singing the praises of
Linda Lang, chief of Jack in the Box. I got religion on her, dude. She’s the
real deal. I said “turnaround.”
Do I need to mention Sally Smith, the CEO of Buffalo Wild
Wings, or Julia Stewart, the deal maker who turned IHOP into the most powerful
franchisor this side of McDonald’s? They lean forward so much that I fear a
fall.
And don’t forget the other side of the foodservice business,
the so-called non-commercial sector. Lorna Donatone is COO of the school
feeding operations of Sodexo, the contract-feeding giant. What she does day to day should be an
inspiration to any government bureaucrat—wracking up accomplishments, with a budget
that sounds like a college student’s allowance.
Mary Molt, assistant director of Kansas State University’s
dining operations, literally wrote the book on high-volume feeding. If your
child ate in a school cafeteria, wolfed down a college breakfast, or even ate a
tray-delivered lunch in a hospital, the meal was a lot better because of the
practices that Mary codified. I’d
suggest she’s been leaning forward for decades, but I’d fear a slap for
suggesting she’s out of her 20s (I wouldn’t
suggest such a thing, but some say that Mary is about to start her fourth
decade in the business.)
We in foodservice have had women leaning forward since the
industry’s birth. But we welcome Sandburg’s advisory to seize ambition and aim
for the big jobs.
Ours is an industry of opportunity. Any theory that
underscores that point will get an amen from us. And a big cheer for all those
who’ve proven in our business that ability trumps gender, regardless of how
your body is leaning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)